Control Studies find "viruses" don't exist - say what?
As this story unfolds I'll add more links.
In the history of mainstream Virus “isolation,” control studies have not been used to qualify the existence of any “virus”. Koch’s Postulates has never been proven i.e. the claimed “isolated” particle hasn’t been proven to cause the disease it’s claimed to cause. Now a group of Scientists are putting Virology to the test and finding that there’s a problem with this Rockefeller Medical Trained Virus Belief System some call a CULT.
Research by Stephan Lanka
The ancient origins of germ theory with Dr Stefan Lanka: (here)
Dr Stefan Lanka's control experiments showing the flaws of virology: (here)
Dr Stefan Lanka on Virology, COVID-19, PCR, HIV & Measles: (here)
The theory of infection with Dr Stefan Lanka, Dawn Lester & David Parker: (here)
Dr Lanka On The Virus Isolation Court Case, Pseudoscience And Non-Existent Viruses (here)
PART 1: THE NEW BODY SOUL BIOLOGY (ENGLISH VOICE OVER) DR STEFAN LANKA (here)
PART 2 : THE NEW BODY SOUL BIOLOGY (ENGLISH VOICE OVER) DR STEFAN LANKA (here)Ekaterina Sugak – CPE Control Exp. Refutes Virological Method for Proving the Existence of Viruses (here)
Kate Sugak w/ Dr. Stefan Lanka & Dean Braus – The End of Virology: 2nd Phase of Control Experiment (here)
Kate Sugak w/ Dr. Stefan Lanka & Dean Braus – The End of Virology: 3rd Phase of Control Experiment (here)Open Letter to Jens Spahn (German Federal Minister of Health) (here)
How dead are viruses anyway? All claims of Virus Existence Refuted (here)
The-Initiators-of-the-Corona-Crisis-Have-Been-Clearly-Identified (here)
PI Water Understanding Water Recognising Life (here)Dismantling the virus theory
The Virus Misconception Part 1 – Measles as an example (here)
The Virus Misconception Part 2 – The Beginning and the End of the Corona Crisis (here)
The Virus Misconception Part3 – Corona simple and understandable (here)
Additional Research disproving “Virus Isolation”
Pablo Gluschankof, 1997 & Julian W Bess, 1997
The Most Detailed Controls Ever Published (here)
The Emperors New Virus - An Analysis of the Evidence for the Existence of HIV (Documentary) - (here)Dr. Thomas Cowan is extremely good at breaking down complex medical ideas and processes of logic/Critical thinking. This introduction into Dr. Lanka’s latest findings is just another step in unveiling how some of the brightest minds have been hoodwinked into “Trusting the Virus-Isolation Science”
Dr. Thomas Cowan - Dr. Stefan Lanka's Phase 2 Experiments (here)
"How to Lie with Mathematics & Going over Part 3 of Stefan Lanka's Study" (Dr. Tom Cowan, 11. Feb. 2022). (here)
Dr Stefan Lanka's control experiments showing the flaws of virology: (here)
The end of virology: the 3rd phase of control experiments for SARS-CoV-2 (here)
CPE – Control Experiment – 21 April 2021 – English Version (here)
THE TRUTH ABOUT RABIES, TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS, GRAPHENE AND THE RESULTS OF THE 2ND CONTROL EXPERIMENT (here)Anyone believing in “viruses” is conditioned onto the wrong path, Pasteur and Koch were both fraudsters; Pasteur copied Bechaum and destroyed his reputation. Pasteur only gained the upper hand with his garbage works causing better "science" connections
"Bechamp or Pasteur? A lost chapter in the history of biology" (here) PDF (here)
Life Science Course LESSON 66 – Contagion, Epidemics
8. KOCH'S POSTULATES
The German scientist, Robert Koch, maintained that for a specific bacteria to be the cause of a disease:
It must be found in every case of that disease.
It must not be found when the disease is not present.
It must be capable of living outside the tissues.
It must then be capable of reintroduction into the organism and producing that disease.
As has been repeatedly demonstrated, specific bacteria do not fulfill these prerequisites.
Robert Koch (1843-1910) was a bacteriologist, physiologist and one of Pasteur's contemporaries. The specific requirements of "Koch's Postulates" follow:
A culture of the bacteria must be taken from a diseased animal.
It must then be grown in pure culture in a laboratory.
After this, the culture has to be injected into a susceptible animal.
It must cause the same disease, and culture must be taken from this animal.
This is a modification of the germ theory, requiring a condition of susceptibility to establish a causal relationship between specific germs and specific diseases.
Scientists know that specific bacteria are not found in every case of a specific disease. The eminent Canadian physician, Sir William Osier (1849-1919) found that the diphtheria bacillus is absent in 28 to 40% of cases of diphtheria. Green's Medical Diagnosis says that tubercle bacilli may be present early, more often late, or in rare instances be absent throughout the disease condition. Koch's first postulate, "the specific bacteria must be found in every case of that disease" is not fulfilled in tuberculosis, diphtheria, typhoid fever, pneumonia, or any other disease. Specific bacteria are not found in every case of a specific disease.
Nor is the second postulate fulfilled, because it is a medically-known fact that bacteria are found in the bodies of humans and animals which exhibit no symptoms of any disease. Specific bacteria are repeatedly found when the specific disease is absent.
Further, bacteria are not capable of living outside the tissues; therefore, the third postulate is not fulfilled. Neither Pasteur nor any of his successors have ever induced a complaint by the inoculation of airborne bacteria, but only by injections from bodily sources. The reason is obvious: germs are dependent on human or animal organisms for their survival.
Quoting from "The Germ Theory Reexamined" by Bob Zuraw and Bob Lewanski (Vegetarian World, Volume 3, Number 11, September-November 1977): "Koch's Fourth Postulate: Introducing germ cultures in a healthy body or organism does not produce signs and symptoms of the disease.The Bio-Chemical Society of Toronto conducted a number of very interesting experiments in which pure cultures of typhoid, diphtheria, pneumonia, tuberculosis, and meningitis germs were consumed by the millions in food and drink by a group of volunteers. The results: no ill effects whatsoever."
But when the condition of susceptibility is introduced, this changes the whole concept. Thus we are back to the same point we have been emphasizing: the condition of the host is of primary importance in the production of disease.
The Most Comprehensive Control Studies of the Virological Methodology Ever Undertaken (here) Video (here)
Sadly, this study has had some setbacks. The scientific integrity of those representing the “No Virus” view is of paramount importance.
Out of Control (here)Perhaps The Most Important Work of Our Time: The Elusive "Virus", The Control Experiment, & Jamie Andrews (here)
The presence of identical "virus-like" particles in "uninfected" cell cultures shatters the illusion that these particles uniquely represent a "pathogenic virus." Their frequent presence where they shouldn't have should have raised serious questions among virologists—but it didn’t.
Which one’s the Spike Protein (here)
Appearances Can Be Deceiving - Viral-like Inclusions in COVID-19 Negative Renal Biopsies by Electron Microscopy (here)Virus-like particles occurring in cultures of stable pig kidney cell lines. Brief report (here)
Multivesicular bodies mimicking SARS-CoV-2 in patients without COVID-19 (here)
The Role of Extracellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV, and SARS Viruses (here)
Being from South Africa, I can’t monetize my substack.
If you’d like to buy me a SA cup of coffee, go - here,
For PayPal contributions, please go - here.
Thank you.
https://linktr.ee/hewettinsite
https://andrew-hewett.pixels.com/