Emperor Constantine, the Council of Nicaea, and Rev. Scofield's influence on the Bible
Someone had to write this, some may be offended while others may tell me that "God"/Divine Source Energy is a frequency I need to be in vibrational alignment with, this I accept as true.
As I understand, there are close to 4,000 Religions on planet Earth. Three of them are the Abrahamic Religions: Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. “Converting” to Judaism is not as easy as it is to convert to Christianity or revert to Islam. All three have different sects and people (flocks) following those interpretations. The two prominent books of Judaism are the Torah and the Talmud. Many believe that followers of the Talmud have more in common with Satanism than Christianity. It is forbidden to change the Arabic text of a Quran, but the interpretations do vary and the two main factions are the Sunni and Shia. The Bible’s text has been changed numerous times, but the “Good News” understanding of Christianity seems constant.
Complete Guide to Bible Versions: Comparison, History, and Philosophy of Top Bible Translations (here)
This “Good News” is based on the “Creed of Nicene” and forms the key tenant of what defines a person as being a Christian and it’s this “Creed” that this article intends to delve into. “Jewish” people tend to see themselves as the “chosen” people. “Muslims” see themselves as having the “truth” and Christians see themselves as being “saved”. I think that most people would agree that a “spiritual life” shouldn’t be divisive or ego-driven. Interpreting oneself as “chosen” could misrepresent the essence of “God’s promise to Abraham”. The story of Abraham and other “prophets” communicating with God and God’s Angels forms a part of all three Abrahamic Religions. Islam “having the truth” can also be an issue, especially if there are different interpretations of a text, and in a world full of lies, it seems like “having the truth” has not helped many “Muslims” who, like most of mankind, have received the toxic Jab of Pharmakeia.
A person aligned with Christianity and who “classifies” themselves as “saved”, has to adhere to accepting specific tenets. Nearly all denominations still perform baptisms, but the primary “salvation” is received via “acceptance” of the “Creed of Nicene” i.e. believing “J”esus CHOSE to die on the Cross to nullify the sins of those who believe this to be true and choosing to believe he chose to be killed guarantees the BELIEVER the reward of everlasting life in “Heaven”. Coupled with this is the Trinity (I don’t believe it is mentioned, as such, in any Bible). This “Trinity” claims that “J”esus is “God’s” son and instead of believing as all the previous prophets taught i.e. there is only One Divine Source of All of Creation, it is believed that the “Holy Spirit”, “God” and “J”esus form a Trinity which happens to also be “One”. Many Christians stumble when trying to explain how this Trinity came into being, but what it does do is it separates “J”esus from being a normal man i.e. it excludes him from being our “brother”/”neighbor”. This means that the experience of being “tempted” by “Satan” would not have been the same as what a normal man would experience when being tempted i.e. there is no “tempting” God, so why would “J”esus feel tempted in the slightest if he was “as” (equal to) God? Was he not flesh, as well as mind and soul? From what I recall, Islam also puts forward that “J”esus was born of a virgin, but then again there are stories of other pre-”J”esus“ gods” who were purportedly were born of virgins. “Amen”, used at the end of a prayer is believed to be linked to Amun-Ra who coincidentally also happened to be one of those Egyptian “gods” born of a virgin (Isis). Some believe that the Romans included many pagan elements coupled with Egyptian ideology within the Bible. Many don’t BELIEVE God “wrote” or had his “Saints” write the Bible 330 post “J”esus, some think Emperor Constantine was a Saintly man who had to put his own son to death after his son slept with the stepmom. How far the apple fell from the tree I can not tell :)
Other Gods Born to Virgins on December 25 Before Jesus Christ (here)
It’s acceptable for “J”esus to have taught his disciples to pray as he prayed i.e. "The Lord’s Prayer”… “Our Father which art in Heaven halo be thy name…” and then post him being killed (his chosen sacrifice) have other people teach that one must now include “in “J”esus’s name” at the end of the prayer, along with “Amen”. Besides this adjustment, according to Matthew 22:36-40, “J”esus was asked what the two most important commandments in the Law were, to which he allegedly replied ”‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” What I found interesting is -“the second commandment is like the first commandment”. I’m guessing that there will be many interpretations, but for myself, it sounds like if you love your neighbor, that’s like loving God, which by extension means that we could ALL be classified as God’s children/creations i.e. not just “J”esus i.e. we see the “god-ness” within ourselves and through this awareness (self-love) we are capable of seeing the “god-ness” (the essence of who we are) in others. This is not an arrogant, egotistical, “god-ness” for that is not the essence of the Divine Source Creator.
Contemplate Infinite Divine Source Energy resonates through all of Creation and that We have the ability, like “J”esus, to tap into vibrational alignment (prayer) and that “J”esus, as our brother/neighbor/teacher/child-of-God, was trying to teach mankind this when the Pharisees plotted to KILL him. After he exposed these money-lending Pharisees for both corrupting the book and their usury practices, they put their silver coins (mammon) to work to purchase a betrayal. They then called in a favor with the Romans to have the Innocent One killed. The Romans being the Governing body of the time didn’t want to be blamed or take responsibility for killing an innocent man. So! They got the IGNORANT masses to VOTE to have “J”esus put to death and then washed their hands of the matter. According to the Bible, “J”esus forgave them all as “they knew not what they were doing”. I recently heard a different version of this tale - “The Temple Guard arrested Him and brought him to the Sanhedrin for an illegal night trial. The Sanhedrin sentenced Him to death for blasphemy, but they required Roman permission for the ultimate penalty of execution. They then brought him to Pilate early in the morning, but he found Him completely innocent. The rent-a-mob demanded His death, and their agitators cleverly played Pilate against the Emperor. To avoid the dilemma Pilate found himself in, he washed his hands and told them to do the dirty deed themselves - and they led Him away, and they crucified Him !” Pilate in this version is very good at hand washing and the voting public seem to be excluded from taking part in the “You have to kill me” story. If Pilate found “J”esus completely innocent, was that for the blasphemy of claiming to be the Omnipresent Devine Source of All Creation.
So! let us have a look at a potential parable.
“J”esus exposed the Pharisees’ usury practices (interest on money lending) within the temple and their corruption of the book (spiritual teachings). “J”esus kicked their tables over for all to see. The corrupt Pharisees decided to use silver coinage to persuade one close to “J”esus i.e. “J”udas, to betray “J”esus. They used their leverage with the Government of the day (Romans) to arrest “J”esus on charges of Blasphemy i.e. accused him of claiming he was God. The Temple Guard arrested Him and brought him to the Sanhedrin (here) for an illegal night trial. The Sanhedrin sentenced Him to death for blasphemy, but they required Roman permission for the ultimate penalty of execution. The story goes that “J”esus after being humiliated by Herod was sent to Pilate (here). They then brought him to Pilate early in the morning, but he found Him completely innocent. The rent-a-mob demanded His death, and their agitators cleverly played Pilate against the Emperor. To avoid the dilemma Pilate found himself in, he washed his hands and told them to do the dirty deed themselves - and they led Him away, and they crucified Him.
Why did passing Jesus back and forth make Herod and Pilate Friends? (here)
There are other versions of this story but by and large, this one is generally accepted by all Christians. The mammon worshiping Money Lenders who also corrupted the Spiritual Teachings (Torah/Law) were exposed by a purely innocent human being. Today’s Money Lenders are the banks (BIS, IMF & World Bank), but the “Religious Book” teachers I’d say are now the Roman Catholic Church. Both support receiving the Jab of Pharmakeia.
Pilate apparently finds “J”esus completely innocent i.e. if the charge was for blasphemously claiming to be the Infinite Source of All Creation (not a conduit), then Pilote believed “J”esus was not guilty of that charge. This seems apparent to me, but not to others, perhaps they think this specific charge the Money Lenders were going to have him killed over wasn’t presented to Pilate (?) - bias is a difficult issue when it’s mixed with belief.
Emperor Constantine believed that disputes within the church would cause disorder within the Roman Empire. The dispute on his mind was Arianism, Arian “Christians” didn’t believe in the immaculate conception of the “Son of Man” and I doubt that they BELIEVED that “J”esus chose to sacrifice himself via the book-corrupting, money-lending, silver-coining Pharisees. There are different versions as to when the Canon of “Christianity” was implemented (incl. the Creed of Nicaea) some think 333AD while others think 379AD. What is apparent is that prior to the Romans gaining control over “God’s New Book” (?), the Arian Christian’s books had not been torn up and they were not outlawed for being heretics, this changed after Emperor Constantine gathered 400 “Bishops” to vote on acceptance of the Creed of Nicaea, 398 voted for, while 2 voted against. The 2 Bishops who voted against were then expelled and I guess became heretics along with the Arian Christians of the day. The Money Lending Pharisees who didn’t accept the Creed were not treated as heretics as they helped Emperor Constantine with through the loan of the books of the Old Testament. Both the Romans and the Pharisees benefited by being let off the “J”esus MURDERERS hook (chosen sacrifice) and Rome with a Religion under their control, could “determine” who was “good” and who was “bad” based on whether they BELIEVED or did NOT BELIEVE. This Creed was later, in the name of “Yeshua”, abused in a multitude of Inquisitions.
Nicene Creed (here)
Many Christians today don’t know that the Bible’s various books, under Emperor Constantine of Rome’s authority, were put together by the Council of Nicaea around 330 AD. Many accept the letter “J” as if this was written directly from “God’s hand” straight into the Bible. This however could not be as at the time of “J”esus the letter “J” did not exist. Considering that the letter “J” only popped onto the scene in 1524, all books written after 1524 would have had to have been changed i.e. “God’s work” would have to have been edited post-1524. Christian scholars claim “J”esus would have been called “Yeshua” while Muslim scholars say “Īsā”. I can’t speak for all the other edits for names like Joseph, Judas, John, Jeremiah, Jacob, Jezebel, etc. They would also have had to have been changed after 1524. Yes! it’s a translation issue - but the meaning gets changed when there’s a translation issue, no? Which problem’s worse altering the meaning of God’s word through a translation glitch (?) or getting the name of his “prophet”/”Messiah” wrong - I don’t know the answer.
Names like Andrew, Peter, etc. were changed when the Hebrew and/or Aramaic Bible was translated into Greek. As I understand the “Old Testament” was written in Hebrew and Aramaic, but the “Jews” of the day also used Greek which was primarily used for the New Testament, later these texts were translated into Latin and from there to English and other languages representing the various denominations too. In Islam, it is not permissible to change one comma of the original Quranic text. Should one “claims” to be worthy of editing one “Biblical word of God” then, I guess, one would have to claim the “Holy Spirit” guided one. This article is not being written to promote Islam (just saying).
When Was The Letter “J” Invented? (here)
The complete history of Bible translations – how the Word was delivered from God to our modern-day Bibles (here)
The Bible’s First Translation Was in Greek (here)
Some Christian friends of mine believe that the Bible was written by the “Saints” and “God”. Well! from what I’ve read it appears that Emperor Constantine after having swindled his brother out of being the supreme leader of Rome had a dream (“Holy Spirit” intervention) to put the Bible together. Some books were left out and it appears some books are overly similar to each other, which is explained away, but this act does put into question the “integrity” of the claim the “Bible” is “God’s work” vs. it could possibly have been tarnished because of a need to control others.
Did Constantine decide what books belonged in the Bible? (here)
How the Bible Borrowed From Other Stories (here)
I remember when I first decided to start reading the Bible, it took me only a few days to recognize that the books of Matthew, Mark, and Luke were too similar i.e. as if they had copied each other or they were “fake” to some extent. This issue has been noticed and “Believers” being “Believers” have found different ways to either brush over it or “explain” it away while maintaining the “Integrity” to “God’s word” (?).
Egyptian Mythology: Osiris is murdered by his brother Set, dismembered, and later resurrected by Isis, symbolizing the cycle of life, death, and rebirth.
Greek Mythology: Dionysus, the god of wine and ecstasy, dies and is reborn, often symbolizing the vitality of nature and the cyclical nature of seasons.
The Holy Spirit forms the (Singular/Infinite) “Trilogy” Vs. “J”esus’s example of teaching to pray to Singular Source Creator /“Our Father” i.e. Singular/Infinite and also informs them to love “Our Father” (singular/infinite) with ALL one’s heart, mind, and soul. If the “Trinity” was an important message for “J”esus to deliver to mankind i.e. alleged “salvation relevance”, one would have thought that moment with Pilate was the perfect opportunity for “J”esus to explain, in a non-blasphemous way how understanding the new “Singular/Infinite Trinity” may help future generations escape the Spanish Inquisition. This alas didn’t happen, but don’t worry Saint Constantine helped clarify the Singular/Infinite “Trilogy” that our divine brother “J”esus dared not mention pre- the Jewish Money Lending crucifixion event for fear of spoiling the sacrificial moment. Post “death” and subsequent “return” and only then can “J”esus let the cat out of the bag and inform his close circle that he “conquered death” and the One “Singular/Infinite” Divine Souce focus that previous prophets taught, on peril of one’s Soul GOING TO HELL, needed to be immediately changed into believing the killing event was a “sacrifice for people’s sins” i.e. the Money Lenders didn’t offer a sheep, they offered up “J”esus and this “offering” was accepted as a “Sin Cleanser” for those who BELIEVED, but just as important was ensuring, on peril of one’s Soul GOING TO HELL, the prayer that he taught (Our Father which …) could now include him as a co-GOD and he also needed to introduce the “Holy Spirit” part to complete the new Trinity Understanding that if believed would ensure the believer would not GO TO HELL. One can see the importance of the delivery of this adaptation to the BOOK/Torah/Law/Commandment … in fact it’s so important i.e. your Soul on the line kind of important, that it becomes more important than those two Commandments/Laws/Torahs he mentioned i.e. Love God with All your heart, mind and soul. The new RULE very likely would have required a shift in thinking from his disciples, they would have to not see the Son of Man as a “brother”/neighbor i.e. the second Commandment (love thy neighbor) but now as a part of a Trinity. Gosh! This is important because if we are to take “J”esus’s word seriously then we need to remember that those two Commandments encompassed All the Commandments for All the Prophets i.e. all Prophets he was referring to were, at that time, before him i.e. the Trinity Amendment would have to not have applied to previous prophet’s understanding of how to get to Heaven, nor anyone else pre-0033 AD (?) i.e. including years when “J”esus would have been in a physical body (pre-resurrection). I don’t believe that those who saw “J”esus post crucifixions claimed to be in alignment with the new Trinity doctrine i.e. pre “death” it would have been seen as a Blasphemous Act, listed in the Torah, to claim one was one with the Infinite Divine Source of All Life. So! souls who, pre-0033, had passed without news of the Nicaea Creed perspective would “legally” (heavily contract) be considered to receive a pass if they just lived by those two most important Commandments. Post- 0033 AD the word would have to spread. Most people have heard of the Spanish Inquisition and other tales of post-Emperor Constantine's spread of the Christian message which included the Trinity, Sin Cleansing, Soul Saving, Church-tithing Beliefs, that if not accepted labeled people as non-believers, as kafars, heretics, one who was HELLBOUND. The Romans, and others, made people realize the importance of being “saved”. No one wanted to be called a “witch”, least of all herbalists.
Inquisition ‑ Spanish, Roman & Torture HISTORY (here)
To my knowledge, post Constantine, all non-Christian Jews would would not have been persecuted for rejecting the Trinity, etc. They could adopt the two Commandments (or not) which encompassed the Law for all the Prophets (or not), not accept the Trinity or “J”esus’s Sin-Sacrifice etc. and still not be labeled as heretics, kafars, etc. Christians and Jews are, oddly enough, allies against the non-Trinity-believing Muslims.
To my knowledge “Child Sacrifice” is a Satanic ritual, so this is where the story gets a little messy. From the Quran's perspective, the sacrifice of a sheep, goat, or cow is part of a biblical tradition dating back to when “God” told Abraham to kill one of his children. Muslims believe the child was Ishmael and Christians believe “God” told Abraham to KILL Isaac. If one is of either faith then it’s likely that you will accept one of those two options as being true as well as believing the story itself to be true. Yes! I get it, it’s like choosing between a “Natural Origin virus” or “Lab Leak virus”, one way or another you still believe in an imaginary “virus”. One can argue from either side whichever seems more logical or even based on which “expert” you trust, but questioning the story would be “blasphemous”. Questioning what “God told Abraham” for both Christians and Muslims would seem blasphemous. Having a “Holy War” over which son was “spared” is perfectly understandable. This rift would be expected, one of these two God-hearing Religions would have to be the Liar. If it was Issac that had to be killed (according to the story) then it would have been the God-promised son vs. the illegitimate (?) out-of-wedlock (?) prophet Abraham’s firstborn who was related to Mohammed (bloodline). So! if it was Ishmael who was chosen to be sacrificed, then Hanna, the unmarried (?) maid, whose only crime was to allow the prophet to take advantage of her out of wedlock (?). Maybe I’ve got this wrong, maybe Abraham would of at least married her, considering his intentions. Anyway! I digress even though “J”esus was from the bloodline of Sarah, the alleged covenant was made with Abraham. If Christianity had it wrong, then it would have been altered at some point when putting the Bible together, likely with Emperor Constantine and the Council of Nicaea (330 AD-ish). If Muslims have it wrong then only Mohammed, an alleged final prophet, has to be blamed for a glitch when “downloading” the Quran. The “Jews” must find this pickle/conundrum interesting, but they wouldn’t exploit this, could they? Okay! Sure! Those who call themselves “Jews” but are not, may exploit this situation to help destroy the Middle East and America at the same time, but that would be expected from Satanists. What a brilliant ploy that would be if it was true, the pretend, mammon-worshiping, “Jew” would get to ignore the Trinity, etc., while pretending to be aligned with the two (un-amended version) important Commandments and then set the Trinity, etc. Believers against those who do believe in the two (un-amended) important Commandments.
Why do Muslims sacrifice livestock? (here)
None of the disciples had the depth of insight to unravel the parables “J”esus taught. Why would he partake in a “Trilogy” without clearly explaining his role in it i.e. leaving it to be disputed over or interpreted by those who even struggled with understanding his parables? When considering the story of “J”esus’s "death as a parable itself, much concerning modern times is revealed. The modern “book” used to teach “Union with Source Creator” like in the time of “J”esus has been corrupted (?), The “Money Lenders” still practice their usury tricks on the masses. Those who “kick their tables over”, expose their evil. They still use the Government of the day to serve their bidding i.e. Governments are indebted to the Globalist Bankers (BIS, the World Bank, and IMF). The Globalist Bankers have monopolized our world and are in partnership with Pharmakeia (Greek word for Sorcery) who have deceived All Nations, by using their Silver Coins to pay “experts” to betray mankind. The indebted Governments do the controllers’ bidding and help fool the ignorant masses into Receiving the Jab of Pharmakeia. In some cases, jab recipients/voters are killed and at other times their innocent children are killed. The thieving Money Lenders are behind the Digital ID drive and they are trying to ensure that Pharmakeia’s One Health Vaxpass, Big Ag’s Carbon Footprint, Big Tech’s Mac Address, Big Brother’s (Government) track and trace surveillance are all connected to their AI Global Enslavement UN Agenda 2030 goals.
Are Banks, Big Pharma & Governments abusing public health for mammon? (here)
Most Zionist Christians wouldn’t dream that Rev. Schofield could have corrupted their “Holy” book even further. This corruption was deliberate, the Zionist killers needed American families to sacrifice their children in defense of “Israel” while believing that somehow it was being done in the service of God Almighty.
The Zionist-Created Scofield ‘Bible’ (here)
THE BIBLE: BEFORE THE SCOFIELD REFERENCE EDITION (here) (read footnotes)
The Schofield Bible - A False Bible (here)
What's this being "Anti-Semitic" towards "Jews" mind game about? (here)
I’m not trying to influence anyone to be “anti-Christ” (far from it), from where I stand it’s Pharmakeia’s “virus” pseudoscience that promotes the “Fear Thy Neighbor” Ideology. Personally, those two commandments “All the Law and the Prophets hang on” work for me. I do think it’s time to be brave, collectively We need to stand up and kick whatever tables need kicking over.
I believe that Christ-loving Christians have been taken advantage of by those intent on controlling all aspects of our existence and if we don’t understand the true history then we are doomed to repeat it.
In an excerpt from a 1990 C-SPAN interview with Brian Lamb, Dan Raviv, and Yossi Melman, authors of the book Every Spy a Prince- The Complete History of Isr@el's Intelligence Community, describes how the Prime Minister's Offices are under the JEWISH MOSSAD INTELLIGENCE.
I know Mossad’s motto is “War through Deception”, but this (?)
Mossad is ISIS (here)
Some Christians may or may not find my article offensive, perhaps even blasphemous. Some may question that without “J”esus’s death how would they be able to mark & pass their life test pre-death? All I can say is - this perspective I’m putting down, regardless of what “faith” (Religion) you may be aligned with It shows us why “J”esus would go along and allow these killers to take his physical life i.e. so that We may clearly see who they are, so We can awaken and understand the nature of the warned of “Beast”, how those in service of “it” (AI Corpocracy) use our collective ignorance and fear to serve their agendas and what we must do to stand up for freedom i.e. walk-in “J”esus’s shoes, kick the tables over, expose their lies. The Truth shall set us free and Our Freedom is important for We are expressions of the Most Divine Source of All, not the slaves of ignorant, Satanic, mammon worshippers.
I have no specific interest in the existence of “Sophia”, if there is a story that is parable in nature regarding “Sophia” I’m always open to learning, but fundamentally everything is created by the One Devine Source of All. I find the following clip, from a quantum science point of view, worth contemplation.
Have you ever wondered if EVERYTHING you see could be an illusion? “J”esus already figured it out 2,000 years ago and what’s even wilder? Modern physics is proving him right.
The Sophia of Jesus Christ (here)
Demiurge
The ancient Gnostics were named after gnôsis, the Greek word for knowledge or insight. Gnosticism was a loosely organized philosophical movement that flourished in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD.
The Gnostics believed that the material world was the result of a primordial error on the part of a divine being (usually called Sophia [Wisdom] or the Logos).
They attributed the creation and control of the material world to a semi-divine, ignorant creature known, who was called, Saklas (the fool) Ialdabaoth (the blind god) the Demiurge (from the Greek dêmiourgos which means craftsman, but which the Gnostics meant as the architect or lesser creative force).
In Gnostic mythology/cosmology, both Sophia and the Demiurge are subordinate to the Supreme Being/Cosmos (God)
The Demiurge was antagonistic to anything spiritual, and had a group of servants known as the Archons (Greek meaning ruler).
The research of Gnostic scholar John Lash reveals that the Gnostics were early mystic shamans who reached high states of consciousness, knew their direct connection with the Cosmos and honored the importance of the female principle (Sophia) to live balanced lives. He concludes that the Catholic Church feared their power, so it killed them and banished the survivors underground.
The Dead Sea Scrolls discovered in Qumran Palestine and the Nag Hammadi Codices discovered in Egypt (both in the 1940s) are important Gnostic texts which expose the truth about the Archons.
Here is a quote from the Apocryphon of John, a Nag Hammadi text. "They sought to overpower humanity in its psychological and perceptual functions… although they saw that human thinking was superior to theirs…
For indeed their delight is bitter and their beauty is depraved. And their triumph is in deception (apaton), leading astray, for their own structure is without divinity."
The Gnostics were postulating the idea of a predatory alien presence that took delight in others' pain and that used deception as a tool.
Disconnected from their own power ("without divinity"), they became parasites that had to hijack the energy of others to survive.
Christ, the Silver Coin Money Lenders, Corruption of the Bible, WWll, "Israel", JFK's Assassination, 911 & Armageddon (here)
The End of Kali Yuga: When the System Collapses (here)
Being from South Africa, I can’t monetize my substack.
If you’d like to buy me a SA cup of coffee, go - here,
For PayPal contributions, please go - here.
Thank you.
https://linktr.ee/hewettinsite
https://andrew-hewett.pixels.com/
Interesting article. I am currently reading a book by Kersey Graves, 'The World's sixteen crucified Saviours' which alludes to many of the things you mention here.