Informed Consent not Given to compromise Health and Reproductive organs
Is it really given by anyone? Are we not all just being herded, either through ignorance or fear, into just going along and receiving the Jab of Pharmakeia
In my previous article -
“Should I give my "Informed" CONsent to receive Pharmakeia's alleged protective injectable concoction?” - (here)
I mentioned (point 1) a study done by Yale University aimed at manipulating people into receiving Jabs of Pharmakeia. Using manipulative messaging using the Yale Study finding on how to coerce people into receiving the Jab of Pharmakeia is ultimately a violation of “Informed Consent”. You may ask “Why is this important?” - well, as history reports, during WWll the Nazis, without permission, experimented on non-Banking-Cabal Jews i.e. NOT - those who call themselves Jews, but are not. Not those who profited off both sides of WWII, not those who “J”esus” called the Synagogue of Satan, i.e, it was good ordinary working-class Jews who were experimented on in WWII. After the war, this experimental violation was exposed at the Nuremberg Trials, and in response to it, obtaining “Informed Consent” as part of any form of biological experimentation was established as paramount in the Universal Declaration called the Nuremberg Code.
Today, when you go buy some groceries at the Supermarket, a tin of baked beans will list all the ingredients used, and a pack of cigarettes will warn you that you may get cancer from smoking. The point is, when you pay the cashier for these products, you are acknowledging that you have been informed, whether you read the labeling or not, and that you, through payment, willingly give your consent to digesting set ingredients. Most toxins included in supermarket products will take time to have a major negative impact on a person’s health. Sometimes, new words are used to describe and hide any negative publicized effects caused by specific ingredients or production practices, which can confuse the purchasing public. There’s a dispute regarding the informed labeling of the practice of Genetically Modified Products (GMOs), companies are now adding non-GMO labels while the negative health impacts of consuming GMO foods continue to unravel. Case in point - Dr. Stephanie Seneff claims that Glyphosate used in GMO crop spray diminishes the body’s ability to absorb vitamin D – this is massively concerning, but while it’s still legal to sell products sprayed with Glyphosate, consumers are giving Informed Consent by paying for these products, ignorant or otherwise. Just because something is currently “legal” doesn’t make it moral, right, or healthy.
Vaccine manufacturers are “legally” protected from being held responsible/accountable for their innate immune-overriding vaccine products, i.e., injected ingredients bypass the protective mechanism our bodies have – the point is detoxing a vaccine is way harder than clearing a swallowed toxin. The Medical Mafia’s injectable product allegedly offers “protection” to a disease, claiming to be caused by and has the attributes now given to the modern understanding of the word “virus”. Unknown to the general public, this is an extremely contentious topic. The Medical Mafia sponsors Regulatory Agencies that approve and promote the alleged “protective” injections as well as lobby Governments, contribute massively to Mainstream Media’s annual income, and much more. Basically! There are many conflicts of interest and their product is moved with the help of Government, Corporate, and School mandates. Suppose one is sold on the questionable and fraudulent “Virus & Vaccine” history and takes one’s child to a local clinic to be “immunized”. In such a case one might, on request (it shouldn’t need to be asked for), see an insert in the box the vaccine was delivered in. It’s your job to read the long list of fine-print ingredients and the potential “side” effects the injection could cause i.e. once the injection is given, your “informed consent” is implied, whether you do or don’t read the insert.
Sasha Latypova wrote a great article …
Memo Re EUA Countermeasures to send to your doctor, pharmacist, employer, school, sheriff, county commissioner, and state lawmakers– (here)
… explains how the Jab Killers established the corrupt Legal platform/framework to experiment on the unsuspecting "virus fearful" public. They conspired to implement a Health Compromising Certificate of Vaccination I.D. (Covid), Depopulating, Transhuman-experimentation PLANdemic all along. They had to use “Relative Risk Reduction” stats con (the waning “95%” till you receive a booster) instead of Actual Risk Reduction (0% “effective” with 9 pages of lethal, health-compromising effects) to fool the public into giving consent to an EUA injection that did not require listing ingredients or listing of “side” effects. The FDA should never have allowed them to use Relative Risk Reduction, and currently, there is a court case dealing with this matter.
"Legally Designed Loopholes" conferring immunity from prosecution need to be examined and overturned, and all those involved in these deceptive practices must be investigated for the potential connection to higher-ups in the Swiss-protected Crime Against Humanity Cabal (BIS/WEF/WHO/GAVI, etc.).
The Schooling system is a key part of overriding children’s innate immune systems with jabs. The media will run stories about “outbreaks” and then the “Health Department” will do an “Initiative” with the Education Department to run an alleged protective “immunization” campaign. Parents receive a slip asking them to place an X on the “option to consent” to having their child allegedly “immunized”, because the child is at school when the alleged “immunization” happens, all the insert information required to make an Informed Choice is waived. The School does not send this information home with the “X approval sheet”.
Google and other search engines are now aligned with the W.H.O. with regards to this “protective racket”, most parents, when trying to research any vaccine, will only see well-scripted promotions aimed at reassuring that set questioned alleged “immunizers” are “safe & effective”. This mantra is not accurate; each vaccine given has a quantity of negative health outcomes that these search engines are either taking down, blocking, or hiding.
In South Africa, a new BELA Bill is in the process of being passed into “Law” - see here. This Bill may very well restrict a parent’s ability to take their child out of school during future orchestrated Plandemics (jailing offenders). If the Government then required alleged “immunization” to attend school then this “X marks the spot game”, besides violating the Nuremberg Code on Informed Consent, will add to parents’ manipulated acquiescence. Already, the schooling system markets “virus fearporn” in children’s textbooks, regardless that not one Controlled Study has ever proven the existence of a virus; in fact, the opposite is true. Hollywood is continuously selling the idea of contagious “viruses,” and the Science community is not opening up the debate on their “virus” beliefs.
Dr. Thorp explains that although he has seen an increase in fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with the COVID-19 vaccination, attempts to quantify this effect are hampered by the imposition of gag orders on physicians and nurses that were imposed in September 2021, as reviewed in the publication “Patient Betrayal:
The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship” (here)
Being from South Africa, I can’t monetize my substack.
If you’d like to buy me a SA cup of coffee, go - here,
For PayPal contributions, please go - here.
Thank you.
https://linktr.ee/hewettinsite
https://andrew-hewett.pixels.com/