USMortality.com's Dive into the Genomics of “SARS-CoV-2”

A collection of articles by USMortality.com regarding how the computer sequence of "SARS-CoV-2" was created in Wuhan China.

There are various parts to dissect when it comes to unraveling the story of how a computer sequence, claimed to be the proof that an alleged “contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus” spread by We the People, came to be accepted as “Scientific Truth” by the US Government, the FDA, the WHO, Big Banks and last, but not least, a group of Jab All Vaxpass Liable-Free Killers.

USMortality.com (here) has also written great articles exposing how liability-free VaxSIN Manufacturers’ “CvD” biotech weapon seems to be responsible for an increase in all-cause mortality in highly vaxsinated countries.

The purpose of writing this article is to attach it to a more comprehensive article -

• Could "they" have pre-created the "Spike Protein" computer sequence for a pre-planned PLANdemic? (here)

USMortality.com has taken a look at the “SARS-CoV-2” computer genome sequence, allegedly “identified in China” from a mucosal sample taken from an ill patient and then later used by Vaxsin Manufacturers to obtain the toxic “Spike Protein” amino acid sequence deployed within the “CvD” biotech-weapons/vaxsins.

Articles on SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Sequencing by - USMortality.com

• A closer look at the first genetic reads mapping.
  Is the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Valid? (here)

• A deep dive into Christian Drosten's COVID-19 PCR Primers...
  How Accurate is the COVID-19 PCR Test Really? (here)

• Besides many of the open questions that I have raised in my previous article, the few main issues with the Wu et al. 2020 paper are:
  1. Not able to reproduce the 384,096 contigs based on the source data (only 22,566 contigs).
  2. There are three versions of the claimed genome uploaded to GenBank

  SARS-CoV-2 Genome Assembly (here)

• According to Dr. Quay, a virologist, the mucosal sample must have been contaminated in the Wuhan Lab, as he observed questionable computer genome sequences within the full genome sequence. I don’t believe in “viruses”, but it stands to reason that question 14 in the article below should have been addressed.
  SARS-CoV-2 Genome Assembly (Part 2) (here)

• Discovering what we can learn from simulating shotgun sequencing
  Why the Ends of the Genome are Important (here)

• Thoughts on the Feasibility of the Lab Leak Hypothesis
  Critical Examination of the Arguments for a Lab Origin of SARS-CoV-2 (here)

• A Quality Control Study of the Tools Used to Discover the SARS-CoV-2 Genome
  How Reliable is Megahit? (here)

• Several attempts to contact the original authors remain unanswered, even via Prof. Holmes.
  Why do Wu et al. 2020 refuse to answer scientific questions regarding the claimed SARS-CoV-2 sequence? (here)

• So in summary, we could see that using 100 reference genomes, and an error rate of 1%, we end up with about ~15 perfectly aligned reads against the head and the tail (and a general coverage of 24). This means if an entire genome was present in the sample, we should be able to find reads that perfectly align against that novel genome.
  Why the Ends of the Genome are Important (here)

The manner in which it is claimed that a “virus” is “isolated” through exposing a cell to starvation, antibiotics, bovine serum, and a range of chemicals, etc, has come under the spotlight. Those who say that the results can not exclude the reaction caused by the methodology. This is a fair point of contention. Genome sequences of “viruses” have been created on the back of this alleged “isolation” process. So! when a mucosal sample (no “isolation” process involved) is used to define if a “novel sequence” exists, but a previous, similar, sequence is used as the template i.e. SARS-1 to establish this, then there are too many area’s between the biology and the computer that can go wrong i.e. a “novel” sequence can be created/not discovered.

• CDC Unable to Scientifically Verify Full SARS-CoV-2 Genome, Leaving Potential for Semi-Random Construct.
  An official CDC FOIA response confirms that the validation of the SARS-CoV-2 genome has not been completed to scientific standards! (here)

• A pending lawsuit urges the organization to reply to my uncomfortable questions!
  Response from the German RKI on Virus Sequencing (here)

Christine Massey sent many FOIA requests to drum home the truth that there is no proof that any alleged “virus” has been satisfactorily “isolated” and “purified” in accordance with being able to prove this through following the Scientific Method.

• FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (224 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
  Christine Massey's unsuccessful "virus" proof requests (here)

For more on the RT-PCR test fraud, go -

• Was it an RT-PCR PLANdemic? (here)

Being from South Africa, I can’t monetize my substack.
If you’d like to buy me a SA cup of coffee, go - here,
For PayPal contributions, please go - here.
Thank you.

https://linktr.ee/hewettinsite
https://andrew-hewett.pixels.com/