The Globalist Stakeholders Club control Americas Military, this helped them pull off 911 as well as run this Jab All New World Order Digital ID Agenda using a fake "virus" to justify injecting people.
Sasha says the viruses are visible, and exist somewhere in her imagination. Ask her to prove viruses exist and have been seen and Isolated! Just watch, she will immediately become a lying, triggered Darpa-droid! 🤡🌎😎
Read what she said before she deleted our little worthless conversation. Specially where she said I was a lier and a troll of the Dumb "Virus no Isolated" Cult, and how she will wipe the floor with me.
Her daughter is probably the one I was chatting with, cause Sasha's english is atrocious!
Prove me wrong and I will delete this! Why the lie? Why was she so triggered? I would like to know what you think? I'm definitely no lier, and I'm not in some "no-virus" cult
Did you here about "123-andme" is Illegal to have done in Ass-rae-Hell? Of course, because nobody has ever isolated or actually seen a strand of DNA either, right. The jews won't tell you this, right?
Thanks in advance, Andrew. Just to let you know, I don't lie!
The debate is NOT about if "viruses exist". At this point no one can claim that they do not exist, even with the mountain of evidence substantiating the likelihood of them not existing - the argument is that - "there is no proof that viruses exist" - that is different from claiming they do or they don't exist - this distinction is important as it points to the Scientific Method that, AS YET, has NOT validated the existence of a "contagious, pathogenic particle" claimed to be "isolated" and claimed to be the cause of disease. The "No Virus" Challengers are cautious to remember this distinction. They will state that there is NO PROOF of the exitance of "viruses" instead - this subtle difference is important as regards to ENSURING "Scientific Integrity" within this challenge. So! if her response was based on this perspective, I can understand. Unfortunately this distinction wasn't cleared up in the communication. It's similar to saying fairies don't exist or saying there is no proof fairies exist, the one says that one has proof that something that doesn't seem real actually doesn't exist i.e. then one becomes responsible for furnishing the proof of the non-existence of this non-existing fairy :) Proofing something that doesn't exist, doesn't exist is not the trap the No Virus Challengers want to find themselves in - vs. if you believe fairies exist, then show me your PROOF, if I can show you that YOUR PROOF is NOT PROOF using logic and reason, then the debate is on and you have to then come up with better "proof" or show me how/why I am wrong.
You BELIEVE we live on a globe, don't you, Andrew? You don't KNOW it, you have never ever seen curvature of any kind, nobody has, and you can't prove it, you just BELIEVE what the satanic jews have Indoctrinated you to BELIEVE! I don't BELIEVE in viruses, I KNOW they are only invisible little jew critters in your delusional imagination!🤣🤡🌎😎 "BELIEF is the enemy of KNOWLEDGE" ! Sasha is a Lyin gatekeeper. Don't make excuses for her lies!
I do know the difference of Believing and Knowing - I have followed her work - you, at this point in time can not prove that viruses do not exist, but you can BELIEVE they don't - this is not "knowing". The "No Virus" Challengers, who Sasha agrees with, can prove that a contagious pathogenic "virus" has never been "isolated" - they KNOW this and so does Sasha. This issue of using words correctly in this case is important as BELIEF is like a Religion/Cult vs. Knowledge that can be openly challenged is the higher moral high ground, a high ground the "vaxpass killers" pretend to have with use of their pseudo-science. You have a bee in your bonnet about Sasha, I don't seem to be able to help you with that, but I see her work and understand where she's coming from - I don't choose sides, I choose Truth, which at times I have to admit I may not KNOW, but in this regard I do understand which is Knowing and which is Believing ... "Not Believing" is not the same as Knowing.
I think this Anaphylaxis exposure of Sasha's is brilliant - I've seen others touch on it and I do believe she is onto something. Sasha, I believe, is aware of the difference of saying "viruses don't exist" vs. saying "contagious viruses as claimed to exist, haven't been proven to exist" or something like in this line of clarity as this clarity is the debate. The "No Virus" Challengers are not claiming "viruses don't exist" (well not in the Scientific context of this debate) even if they are inferring it.
It's pretty easy to KNOW, If something has never ever been seen, I'ts INVISABLE, right, in other words, imaginary, right? Believing in the Creator, does not mean he exists, right? You have to KNOW, he obviosly created our earth in the center of the universe, and we are important, but you BELIEVE the sun is the center of the Universe, and we aren't important, right? You BELIEVE in (as Jesus called them), "The synagogue of satan's" LIES. BELIEFS are LIES, TRUTH Is KNOWLEDGE .
Sasha says the viruses are visible, and exist somewhere in her imagination. Ask her to prove viruses exist and have been seen and Isolated! Just watch, she will immediately become a lying, triggered Darpa-droid! 🤡🌎😎
I don't know where you are getting this from? - I believe she totally gets the "No Virus" view and I found this article of hers very interesting - https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/23-and-me-is-collapsing-turns-out
https://open.substack.com/pub/merrick1/p/a-little-chat-with-sasha-on-the-redacted?r=1hywhr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web.
Read what she said before she deleted our little worthless conversation. Specially where she said I was a lier and a troll of the Dumb "Virus no Isolated" Cult, and how she will wipe the floor with me.
Her daughter is probably the one I was chatting with, cause Sasha's english is atrocious!
Prove me wrong and I will delete this! Why the lie? Why was she so triggered? I would like to know what you think? I'm definitely no lier, and I'm not in some "no-virus" cult
https://open.substack.com/pub/merrick1/p/sashas-sweet-little-daughter?r=1hywhr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Did you here about "123-andme" is Illegal to have done in Ass-rae-Hell? Of course, because nobody has ever isolated or actually seen a strand of DNA either, right. The jews won't tell you this, right?
Thanks in advance, Andrew. Just to let you know, I don't lie!
The debate is NOT about if "viruses exist". At this point no one can claim that they do not exist, even with the mountain of evidence substantiating the likelihood of them not existing - the argument is that - "there is no proof that viruses exist" - that is different from claiming they do or they don't exist - this distinction is important as it points to the Scientific Method that, AS YET, has NOT validated the existence of a "contagious, pathogenic particle" claimed to be "isolated" and claimed to be the cause of disease. The "No Virus" Challengers are cautious to remember this distinction. They will state that there is NO PROOF of the exitance of "viruses" instead - this subtle difference is important as regards to ENSURING "Scientific Integrity" within this challenge. So! if her response was based on this perspective, I can understand. Unfortunately this distinction wasn't cleared up in the communication. It's similar to saying fairies don't exist or saying there is no proof fairies exist, the one says that one has proof that something that doesn't seem real actually doesn't exist i.e. then one becomes responsible for furnishing the proof of the non-existence of this non-existing fairy :) Proofing something that doesn't exist, doesn't exist is not the trap the No Virus Challengers want to find themselves in - vs. if you believe fairies exist, then show me your PROOF, if I can show you that YOUR PROOF is NOT PROOF using logic and reason, then the debate is on and you have to then come up with better "proof" or show me how/why I am wrong.
I'll have a look, BUT In this latest and most IMPORTANT interview she not only exposes all vaxsins as being harmful, but she agrees that "viruses" have not been "isolated" - https://rumble.com/v5kbdzh-anaphylaxis-by-vaccines-discussion-with-dr.-jane-ruby.html
You KNOW it's the jews, right Andrew???
You BELIEVE we live on a globe, don't you, Andrew? You don't KNOW it, you have never ever seen curvature of any kind, nobody has, and you can't prove it, you just BELIEVE what the satanic jews have Indoctrinated you to BELIEVE! I don't BELIEVE in viruses, I KNOW they are only invisible little jew critters in your delusional imagination!🤣🤡🌎😎 "BELIEF is the enemy of KNOWLEDGE" ! Sasha is a Lyin gatekeeper. Don't make excuses for her lies!
I do know the difference of Believing and Knowing - I have followed her work - you, at this point in time can not prove that viruses do not exist, but you can BELIEVE they don't - this is not "knowing". The "No Virus" Challengers, who Sasha agrees with, can prove that a contagious pathogenic "virus" has never been "isolated" - they KNOW this and so does Sasha. This issue of using words correctly in this case is important as BELIEF is like a Religion/Cult vs. Knowledge that can be openly challenged is the higher moral high ground, a high ground the "vaxpass killers" pretend to have with use of their pseudo-science. You have a bee in your bonnet about Sasha, I don't seem to be able to help you with that, but I see her work and understand where she's coming from - I don't choose sides, I choose Truth, which at times I have to admit I may not KNOW, but in this regard I do understand which is Knowing and which is Believing ... "Not Believing" is not the same as Knowing.
I think this Anaphylaxis exposure of Sasha's is brilliant - I've seen others touch on it and I do believe she is onto something. Sasha, I believe, is aware of the difference of saying "viruses don't exist" vs. saying "contagious viruses as claimed to exist, haven't been proven to exist" or something like in this line of clarity as this clarity is the debate. The "No Virus" Challengers are not claiming "viruses don't exist" (well not in the Scientific context of this debate) even if they are inferring it.
It's pretty easy to KNOW, If something has never ever been seen, I'ts INVISABLE, right, in other words, imaginary, right? Believing in the Creator, does not mean he exists, right? You have to KNOW, he obviosly created our earth in the center of the universe, and we are important, but you BELIEVE the sun is the center of the Universe, and we aren't important, right? You BELIEVE in (as Jesus called them), "The synagogue of satan's" LIES. BELIEFS are LIES, TRUTH Is KNOWLEDGE .