"Virus Hypothesis" Fairytale in peril
Time to break down the "SARS-CoV-2 virus" story spread by the modern day "Church of Virology" BELIEVERS.
A few years back I conversed with Jeremy R. Hammond regarding the perspective of the so-called “Virus Deniers”. I came away still not convinced “Virus Believers” were telling the truth, but I did learn that these believers have accepted that the old term for virus, i.e. poison, began to have various combinations of the following three attributes - Transmission (Contagion), Replication (Proliferation) and Infection.
Having sat on the fence between the Terrain Theory view and the “Virus” Hypothesis view ensured that I listened to as many “experts” as I could. This “debate” on how the body works is over a century old and shrouded in much historical and biological controversy. Sadly, the world remembers one of Germ Theory’s pioneers Louise Pasteur, but has hardly even heard of the godfather of Terrain Theory, the great Antoine Bechamp.
How did the virologist come to realize that the pathogenic viruses he was chasing did not exist?
Point 1: No valid control experiments for claimed cytopathic effects
Point 2: Structures in electron microscopy images are not to be viral
Point 3: No physical isolation or biochemical characterization of any “virus” particles
Point 4: No control experiments for the alignment of “virus genomes” and no confirmation that the claimed complete nucleic acid strands exist in nature
Point 5: Invented in silico templates are being used to find “viruses” in uncontrolled experiments.
Point 6: No pathogenic viruses have ever been found directly from living organisms
Point 7: No disease transmission has ever been demonstrated in controlled scientific experiments
Infection
This means that a “virus” particle enters the cell before supposed “replication” begins. As I understand, there is no proof that this phenomenon occurs, and some (Dr. Robert Young) call what virologists do view as INfection as being an OUTfection i.e. meaning - the body’s response to an invader is to remove it. Some “Virus Deniers” put forward the view that exosomes help the body extract an invasive pathogen/antigen and it’s possible that an OUTfecting, now toxic, exosome (in some “virus isolation” cases) is being identified/misdiagnosed as “a virus”. This distinction is extremely important - as this means an “external non-virus antigen" within the Microbiome are being falsely mistaken for the “cause of disease”. Unfortunately, when the virologist’s “isolation” process occurs, cells are starved, fed antibiotics, and toxified, it’s very likely just toxified cell debris claimed to be “isolated” from the cells of ill patients. This view would mean that the real CAUSE OF DISEASE would need to be investigated in order to heal the specific illness. Dealing with the real cause would be sufficient to heal the patient i.e. there would be no need for fake “immunization”. This view goes against the “protective” Medical Mafia’s mass vaccination gravy train and they likely have killed people to keep this train on track.
SECOND THOUGHTS ABOUT VIRUSES, VACCINES & THE VIRAL INFECTIOUS vs. OUTFECTIOUS HYPOTHESIS (here)
The Infectious Myth Busted & "Isolation" Issues - Mike Stone & Co. (here)
The claim that conventional vaccine ingredients stay at the deltoid muscle is dependent on there being NO asperation problems. A low, affected, percentage of people end up with the jab’s ingredients in their interstitial fluids (internal Terrain). This is bad and very likely, through a pleomorphic reaction and direct toxification, becomes the cause of disease in the recipient.
Dr Andrew Kaufman explains the concept of pleomorphism (here)
Microzyma (Somatids) & Pleomorphism (here)
Isolation of a Virus & Replication
When the “virus” is being “isolated” from a cell, in a petri dish, the cell is subjected to multiple contaminating ingredients. “Virus” deniers view this process as being pseudo-science, i.e. use of streptomycin, trypsin, antibiotics, bovine serum, and starving the cell all affect the cell’s breakdown. Once done, “particle debris” may seem as if the “virus” particle has been “discovered”, but in reality, using this technique can ensure spike-like characteristics are CREATED, i.e. this is pseudo-science. The use of antibiotics can proliferate exosome activity. Bovine serum and use of the other chemicals, etc,. contaminate the entire “isolation process”. Those who wear the “Virus Belief” spectacles would argue that they have no other way to break open the cell to view the “virus” i.e. a foregone conclusion that what they are looking for is a “virus” and not cell debris or a toxic exosome etc. Some would argue that the genetic sequence created from these particles can prove proliferation properties, but as I understand, an “out-fection” vs. an “in-fection” argument, i.e. we are self-cleansing organisms. Genetic sequencing is fallible and open to misinterpretation and trickery too.
A brief history -
Unscientific Human Experiments (here)Virus Isolation from Common Colds Occurring in a Residential School (here)
Cultivation of "Difficult" Viruses from Patients with Common Colds (here)
The process of “virus” isolation -
A Farewell to Virology (videos) - (here)The Viral Delusion - (here)
Contagion
The best non-virus view I’ve heard on “catching” and “spreading” a disease is - that if an enzyme can sync women’s periods, then is it not possible that other non-verbal signals between people could trigger a detoxing experience. This means that a healthy person can’t be made sick by an unhealthy person. It doesn’t mean a healthy person can’t be made sick through EMF warfare or nanoparticle toxins, etc. The “Contagion” concept, yet again, to the best of my knowledge has never been proven. Experiments trying to make a healthy subject ill by a “virus-invested” subject is still a “Theory”/belief system, i.e. actually a Hypothesis - no provable science. This idea flies in the face of Epidemiology, but there are other causes, and wearing the “virus glasses” has biased the understanding of this important likelihood.
Can you catch a Cold? (here)
SARS-CoV-2
This is the name of the “virus” claimed to be the cause of the COVID-19 illness. That keeps things simple, but when looking into this particle’s history and previous plandemics, it appears there is an evolution based on a deliberate Globalist Political Agenda. If one believes this “virus” caused you to “Fear your Neighbor” then there are two possibilities to its creation - Natural Origin or Lab Leak, not knowing anything about this subject and viewing it only from those two perspectives will ensure you maintain a subconscious BELIEF in invisible “viruses”.
When I first started looking into the “Gain-of-Function” of SARS-CoV-2, I noticed that those who were exposing the “SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence” (“sequenced” & emailed from “China” i.e. not “isolated”) had been man-altered, they were always focused on the toxic Spike Glycol Protein’s (SGP) alterations.
Adaptations to the "Spike Glycol Protein" Computer Sequence were Ignored during Operation WarpSpeed (here)
Dr. Martin has done a great job at exposing the INTENTION of these Spike-protein Criminals
Dr. David Martin International covid summit (here)
Dr. Martin explained that the sequenced clone, created by Ralph Baric, was Infectious Replicative Defective. Dr. Meryl Nass has also done an article where she claims Baric’s sequence was Transmissible Defective.
Is This the Man Who Created COVID-19 in Fauci’s U.S. Lab?/ Daily Skeptic (here)
Karen Kingston has done many videos exposing that aerosolized nanoparticles of a sequence could have been manufactured, i.e. the Spike Protein and introduced into our Microbiome.
Truth Science & Spirit Covid 19 Nanotech & Synthetic Biology Bioweapons Ep 3: Convo w Karen Kingston (here)
Dr. Zach Bush puts forward that we are flooded by “coronaviruses” (debatable view) and that “viruses” are Microbiome Update Particles i.e. they follow Hormesis prophylactic science and help us adapt to our Microbiome. This view would make these particles corona”vaccines”. Considering the “isolation” process of “coronaviruses,” I think Dr. Bush’s view is based on the 1965 patent and not the Science.
Dr Zach Bush's view of updating "viruses" relating to toxic agricultural practices (here)
Mike Stone of www.viroliegy.com goes through the pseudo-science used to “qualify” the existence of “coronaviruses”.
Category: Coronavirus (here)
RT-PCR tests
For a year and a half, the Health Departments of Governments around our world allowed people to be subjected to having the RT-PCR tests shoved up their noses. I have created a collection of the best interviews and Science as to why ZERO % of these tests proved a single person had contracted the Invisible Virus. I didn’t even need to go into the ‘Germ Theory” vs. “Terrain Theory” debate to show this was a complete CON. Sadly those who sell the “Virus Hypothesis” are now forced to ignore how the Money Lending Cabal distributed these fake data narrative tests globally.
Was it an RT-PCR PLANdemic? (here)
Genetic Sequencing
This is the new kid on the block. Many, like Hammond, feel that this modern computer sequencing method is completely accurate and above question. Dr. Andy Kaufman, Dr. Mark Bailey, and Dr. Stefano Scoglio (here) do a great job breaking down how the sequence identification of SARS-CoV-2 is based on false assumptions.
These two videos done by Dr. Stefan Lanka and narrated by Steve Falconer-
PART 1: THE NEW BODY SOUL BIOLOGY (ENGLISH VOICE OVER) DR STEFAN LANKA (here)
PART 2: THE NEW BODY SOUL BIOLOGY (ENGLISH VOICE OVER) DR STEFAN LANKA (here)
Genetics genome in resolution (here)
The idea that other “virus” sequences can be added to a “Spike Protein” sequence is part of the “Gain-of-Function” view. This new “Spike Protein” sequence with its other “virus” sequences can then be joined to a modified “coronavirus” sequence and then synthetically produced and spread via people across the globe - as they believe. The problem isn’t that sequences on a computer can’t be added together, it’s do these sequences have meaning i.e. are they really the cause of “contagious” disease in the first place? I’m sure that combining sequences like venom peptides and furin cleavers likely do ensure negative health outcomes, but this article is about the Belief in “Viruses”.
The following link presents that an “HIV” sequence was inserted into the “Spike Protein”.
HIV (GLYCOPROTEIN 120) WAS INSERTED INTO THE SPIKE PROTEIN THE US GOVERNMENT OWNS THE PATENT (here)
This article below explores the assertions of the above clip and more -
The "Virus" we included in your jab caused your disease - CON (here)
Mike Stone of www.viroliegy.com has put in exceptional effort dispelling the “virus” isolation and genetic sequencing lie
The Challenges in Genome Library Construction (here)
“Viral” Genomics: Nothing but Strings of Letters in a Data Bank (here)
The Case Against “Viral” Genomes (here)
Limitations in Genome Sequencing Technology and Data Analysis (here)
How Accurate and Reliable are Genomes? (here)
DNA and RNA Shearing/Fragmentation (here)
The Hypothetical Conversion of RNA to cDNA (here)
Genome Contamination: A Widespread Problem (here)
The Indirect Approach (here)
The Challenges Related to RNA Extraction for Genome Sequencing (here)
The “Virus” of Sin (here)
The Viral Delusion intro (here)
The Testing Pandemic: Conspiracy Theory No More (here)
Viral Transport Media (here)
Virologists: Making Conclusions Not Justified by the Data (here)
Gain-of-Function Switch
They had to create a fake “virus” (story) from which they could then take/extract the fake “spike protein” particle and then MODIFY its synthetic genetic computer sequence to establish a “gain-of-function” narrative for people to further buy into the “viral” propaganda and set the stage for Plandemic 2. They needed to keep denying “gain-of-function” as this reverse psychology would buy them time to roll out the “safe & effective” jabs and ensure Military Intelligence and the Regulatory bodies had a justifiable excuse not to insist that the Spike Protein sequence (made in the USA, emailed from China) be thoroughly inspected for potential bioweapons capabilities. Having the public “believe” in “gain-of-function viruses” post “CvD Immunization” rollout, helps sell the second Plandemic, the justification to slaughter livestock and implement further Vaxpass narratives.
Electromagnetic Frequencies + Toxification = "COVID-19" (prove me wrong) (here)
Antibodies
To the best of my knowledge, the only “antibodies” I’ve ever heard mentioned are Immunoglobulin A, G, E, M and Y. Should these particles be named “antibodies”? or better yet, shouldn’t they be the only particles awarded the name antibody? It’s claimed that specific “antibodies” that are “created” against exposure to an antigen/pathogen/toxin/”virus” ensure the creation of “Immunity”. This is another part of the “Virus Hypothesis” fairytale. The FDA “approves” toxic disease-causing vax$ins to be injected into babies based on non-specific antibody response to toxic SHIT (adjuvants) included in the Pharmakeia’s concoction i.e. there’s no proof a “specific antibody” is elicited to create “specific immunity”.
What's the story with "antibodies"? (here)
Hormesis & Transhumanism
Hormesis Science, largely “officially” ignored by Modern Medicine, claims that the body has two reactions to a toxin/poison. If there is a small quantity introduced then resistance to this toxin/poison is formed, if too much is introduced then the body goes into a protective/survival mode. Allegedly these mRNA jabs are introducing a quantity of the toxic Spike Protein into the body, to then put forward a “booster” program would be anti the protective/resistant mechanism validated by Hormesis Science.
What is Hormesis? From Hugo Schultz to Radiation Hormesis (here)
Besides causing sterilization, heart disease, neurological fog, and sudden death, etc. it is believed that the “booster program” is designed to further a Transhumanist agenda i.e. it’s all about doing a Nano-BioTech Experiment on mankind.
Transhumanism and Injectable Nano-BioTech (here).
Who knows just how long these transhuman experiments go back? It appears at least 17 years i.e. PEG can self-assemble into liquid crystal mesogens.
Was It Known In Science That Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), Key Ingredient in C19 Bioweapon Shots, Can Create Self Assembly Nanofibers, Spheres, And Mesogen DNA biosensors? Yes, Since 2007 (here)
Dr. Ana Mihalcea explains how a hydrogel sequence was attached into the “Spike protein sequence” i.e. their intention was always mass vax$ination (not “Immunization”) and their FAKE Virus story was the only way to get people to accept RECEIVING Pharmakeia’s bioweapon.
BIOWEAPONS MASQUERADING AS A VACCINE - Brain-Computer Interface With Karen Kingston and Maria Mihalcea (here)
Biblical
The “Virus Hypothesis” is being used to establish a CULT mindset that preaches “Fear Thy Neighbour’s Invisible Virus” - this false “medical” view is not aligned with many Spiritual Teachings.
Biblical texts seem to warn against “false prophets”, who would think they would be Rockefeller-trained “virus-believing experts”?
Matthew 24:11 – and many false prophets will arise and mislead many. i.e. those who deceive others from realizing what’s going on i.e. the Jabs are NOT “Immunizers” and Virus-fairytale storytellers believe a LIE.
Revelation 18:23 – and the light of a candle shall no more at all in thee, and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all In thee; for thy merchants were the great men of the earth, for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived. i.e. Greek word for Sorcery is Pharmakeia and their Transhuman experimentations are affecting people’s Consciousness connection/awareness.
Glyphosate, Fluoride, Aluminum, and EMFs shut off the Pineal Gland (here)
Additional links worth a look into -
1. A Farewell To Virology (Expert Edition) (here)
2. All-cause mortality is the most accurate data, and it shows absolutely no evidence of a Covid pandemic. (pdf document by Prof. Rancourt) (here)
3. The End of Germ Theory (here)
4. Viroliegy - Exposing the lies of Germ Theory and virology using their own sources (here)
5. DR LEE MERRITT PARASITES AND THE VIRUS DECEPTION - GREG REESE (here)
6. Control Studies find "viruses" don't exist - say what? (here)
These links deal with more “virus” trickery -
1. Introduction to the Pharmakeia Deception - Part 1 - The Problem - (here)
2. Was it a RT-PCR PLANdemic? (here)
I’m not claiming that the people involved in the above content have it all worked out, but they have pointed out some serious issues regarding BELIEVING the Virus Story and this should be enough to ensure this topic is addressed. Failure to address this massive Elephant is a failure to represent Science and stinks.
Being from South Africa, I can’t monetize my substack.
If you’d like to buy me a SA cup of coffee, go - here,
For PayPal contributions, please go - here.
Thank you.
https://linktr.ee/hewettinsite
https://andrew-hewett.pixels.com/