Why The Highwire has gotten it wrong regarding Measles being caused by a "virus" - Part 1

The Highwire uses Mainstream "Science" to expose vaxsins and to continue validating the "virus cause of illness" Ideology.

Del Bigtree is on record stating that a huge percentage of peer-reviewed, mainstream “Science” is flawed, yet without fail Del and his team manages to link mainstream “Science” together in such a way as to both sell the belief that “viruses” are real, while toxic vaxsins are compromising people’s health. This approach is likely useful for the vast quantity of Rockefeller Trained doctors who have, like The Highwire and the bulk of the “Health Freedom Movement”, not taken the time to look into the “No Virus” Challengers work showing that virology itself is a pseudo-science specifically created to sell the “Fear Thy Neighbour’s Virus” Ideology so as to “validate” the Medical Mafia’s “offer” to “immunize” mankind. These new “liability-free” mRNA biotech weapons, now called vaxsins, aren’t required to “immunize” and the definition of vaxsins was changed at the start of 2020, now they only need to be perceived (data statistic con) to be capable of preventing “Hospitalization and Death”.

Besides the issue of antibodies being “measured” to infer an “accurate” response to the invisible “virus”, Del would also need to take into account the Bolus Effect and the Hormesis Effect when looking at all “studies” that infer “knowledge” of “immunogenicity” and “virus spread”, not to mention how a deficiency in nutrients and toxicity exposure is ignored in these mainstream “studies”.

• What is Hormesis? From Hugo Schultz to Radiation Hormesis (here)

• The Bolus Theory - Interview Marc Girardot (here)

Del understands how vaxsin studies are either not done, and many that many pro-vaxsin studies have conflicts of interest and no proper controls, etc. BUT what is interesting is that the studies that The Highwire cherry-pick are put forward as being accurate, BUT how accurate are they? Del and Jeffery don’t question the existence of “viruses,” i.e, “isolation,” etc. The only proper Control Studies used in virology show that there are NO VIRUSES lol … something Del and the entire Health Freedom Movement seem, after 5 years, to still be ignorant about. If Del doesn’t QUESTION “diseases” he believes are caused by an invisible “virus” could almost certainly be caused by something else, then he won’t question the “science” being cherry-picked to demonstrate the problem with vaxsins.

• Del Bigtree: “Science Has Now Become a Religion; It’s Become an Orthodoxy” (here)

• The experiment that shows that virology is bullshit, Tom Cowan, MD explains (here)

• A collection of Articles showcasing the "No Virus" Perspective (here)

Besides The Highwire ignoring flaws in “virus” isolation, they seem to assume that studies, presented by them, that qualify “antibodies”, currently called “immunoglobulin”, to infer “immunity” to the alleged “virus,” have arrived at the correct “immunological” understanding of what the body is doing.

• What's the story with "antibodies"? (here)

So Del agrees that receiving a toxic injection does nothing to increase the alleged “community/herd immunity”. It doesn’t because it’s not about “immunity”, it’s about suppressing a detoxing experience while potentially compromising people’s short and long-term health. I bet that the claimed 97% “effective” number, mentioned in the following clip, is based on a “Relative Risk Reduction” statistic con. Del continues to sell “Pathogenic Priming” instead of viewing the negative effects as “Compromised Internal Terrain” that is subject to pleomorphism.
Del expresses the idea that the vaxsins had a 31% (likely higher) failure rate. Is it not possible that this detox (Measles) that those “31%” (likely higher) experienced represented people who both needed to detox, and the jab recipients received a less health-compromising/detox-suppressive batch than others? This isn’t about “vaxsin” failure, as we don’t have an “Immune System”; the failure is how these jabs compromise our Self-Cleansing Detoxing Protective System and then ensure negative health consequences. Those vaxsinated who did experience this Measles detox were fortunate to have their bodies functioning properly. I can’t talk to the alleged “strain” as this is likely a CON, i.e, the “testing” that validated the alleged “strain”.

• Please watch and read the Show Notes -
  DEL DISPELS MISINFORMATION ABOUT MEASLES (here)

Show Notes and My Interpretation

Measles is a natural detoxing experience. A comparative study, within a fully “immunized” population, should seek to assess the prevalence of chronic disease between alleged “asymptomatic immunized” vs. those allegedly “immunized” who still expressed measles symptoms. If the alleged “asymptomatic” injected experiences more Cancer and Heart problems, then this would indicate a potential suppression of a detox experience, through vaxsination, and may result in more chronic illness than those who are “immunized” and don’t express measles symptoms.
It’s claimed that “natural infection” (out-fection) of Measles leads to fewer Cancer and Heart problem issues, whether it’s the jab restricting detoxing or it’s the content of the jab that causes harm it appears that not “immunizing” is the key to sustained health, all that is required is actual “safe & effective” treatments and the stopping of these alleged “immunizations.”
Del is right to think that vaxsins are a “Symptom Blocker”, but this has nothing to do with “catching” an “invisible virus” and everything to do with the natural detoxing mechanisms of the body.

• 9 July 2019
  The vaccination coverage in the country has been consistently high, over 95% with both the first and second doses of measles and rubella vaccines provided to children under the routine immunization program.

  Sri Lanka eliminates measles (here)

There are two main negative effects with vaxsins, they can temporarily suppress the natural detoxing process, which is perceived as short-term “immunity,” and they add additional toxicity into the body (take Bolus effect into a/c), they increase mild, moderate, and chronic illness. Measles is not caused by a “virus”, so whatever the measuring method claiming this detoxing experience is caused by either a “vaxsin strain” or the “natural mutation”; it’s bogus.

• 4 Jan 2024
  UNICEF, together with WHO, will support the Ministry of Health in implementing a supplementary measles immunization activity (SIA) in Sri Lanka aimed at controlling the ongoing measles outbreak, midst over 700 measles cases reported in the country since May 2023.
  UNICEF supports Ministry of Health to accelerate supplementary measles immunization activity in Sri Lanka (here)

Prior to the introduction of Measles vaxsins it was established that this illness was on a radical decline, so the introduction of detox-suppressive injections can’t really take any “credit”, but with this suppression being short-lived and people’s health being more and more compromised (Bolus effect for injections and new environmental toxins) it’s natural for the alleged “in-fection” (out-fection) rates to increase to pre-jab figures or even worse. “Waning immunity” is when the detoxing-suppression wears off, like the effects of sobriety on a drunk. One issue to consider is Hormesis Science i.e. should exosomes (carrying toxicity) be what’s is being claimed to be “isolated” i.e. not biological debris or an “invisible virus”, then it’s possible that the body can build a resistance (IgG antibodies), which wears off over time, to the alleged “immunizers”, thus perceived “immunity” to a “virus” can be assumed. This is a hypothetical view, and while this appears close to the “immunity model,” it’s actually a developed resistance to a toxin (Hormesis Science) and not “immunity”. There are numerous toxins in vaxsins, so at this stage, that hypothesis is a bit of a stretch.

Words like "short-term immunity" or "long-term immunity" are all based on "antibodies" they test for and never specifically measure off against and a scientifically proven "isolated virus". We do, however, develop resistance against toxicity, and that resistance wanes. Detoxing an external toxin vs. expelling growth spurt toxicity (internal) is different, once growth spurt (internal) toxicity has been detoxed (Measles Symptoms) by those who qualify for this detox (nutrient deficiency, etc.), then it's done, i.e, it’s not "long-term immunity". Once one has recovered from detoxing external toxicity a resistance to set toxin exposure occurs, but this is where the quantity of exposure relative to the toxin in question becomes important i.e. Hormesis Science i.e. one could develop a resistance/protection towards DDT spray if one is introduced to it slowly and in small quantities (I’m not encouraging this).

The simulation reveals that in the pre-vaxsin era, approximately 10.6% of the population was susceptible to measles, most of whom were children less than 10 years of age. With the institution of the measles “immunization” program, the proportion of susceptible individuals in the population fell to 3.1% from 1978 through 1981 but then began to rise by approximately 0.1% per year to reach about 10.9% in the year 2050. The susceptibilities at this time were distributed evenly throughout all age groups. The model did not consider the potential effect of waning “immunity,” i.e, “waning resistance”.

• The Future of Measles in Highly Immunized Population (here)

Naturally, Del continues with the “virus-catching” view of disease based on the evolved “contagious” understanding of the word “virus”. Because the Rockefeller-sponsored Germ Theory has brainwashed doctors, etc, to believe we have an “Immune System” using words like “waning”, “boosting”, and “asymptomatic” helps maintain some semblance of “logic” regarding the “Virus Hypothesis”.

• Here, we parametrize such a model for measles and show how vaccination can have a range of unexpected consequences, as it reduces the natural boosting of immunity, as well as reducing the number of naïve susceptibles.
  In particular, we show that moderate waning times (40–80 years) and high levels of vaccination (greater than 70%) can induce large-scale oscillations with substantial numbers of symptomatic cases being generated at the peak.
  In addition, we predict that, after a long disease-free period, the introduction of infection will lead to far larger epidemics than those predicted by standard models. These results have clear implications for the long-term success of any vaccination campaign and highlight the need for a sound understanding of the immunological mechanisms of immunity and vaccination.
  Implications of vaccination and waning immunity (here)

• Insight on the Impact of External and Internal Boosting on Varicella-Zoster Virus Reactivation Based on Evidence from the First Decade of the United States Universal Varicella Vaccination Program (here)

• Universal varicella vaccination: efficacy trends and effect on herpes zoster (here)

• Shingles: Why is it on the rise? (here)

When I read the following, “Measles vaccination was performed in the arctic district of Scoresbysund, Greenland in 1968, which had never been exposed to natural measles.” I have to wonder, are they saying no one was ever diagnosed with a growth spurt detoxing that presented itself as “Measles” prior to 1968? Or did the people in Greenland have sufficient vitamin A levels? It seems to me that people in Greenland were the perfect Control Group before Pharmakeia managed to convince the Greenland Government, using their “Fear the Virus” Ideology, to basically compromise the Health of Greenlanders.

• “During a serological survey to examine the immunity status of the vaccinees, it was discovered that a temporary increase in measles antibodies took place in the majority of the population 2–4 years after the vaccination” – are they claiming a fluctuation in IgG antibodies represented a “temporary” increase in “immunity” lol.
  Claiming an increase in antibodies amongst the vaxsinated after 2-4 years is proof that the alleged “asymptomatic” jabbed have now “contracted the virus” is insane.
  The antibody measurements … lead to the conclusion that the rise in measles antibodies observed, 2-4 years after measles vaccination, was… caused…by an infection with the measles “virus”.
  Measles can apparently (BS) also spread among seropositive persons, which eventually could lead to clinically manifest measles in seronegative persons. (This is an assumptive hypothesis, i.e, never proven). If this were not the case, it would be difficult to explain the rise in measles “virus” antibodies which occurred in Scoresbysund in about two-thirds of the seropositive vaccines 2-4 years after the vaccination with “live measles” vaccine virus. There are numerous explanations for these antibodies being present, i.e, how accurate are the tests? What else can bring about these antibodies? (view - What’s the story with antibodies?)
  Subclinical measles infection in vaccinated seropositive individuals in arctic Greenland. (here)

Although the relative importance of traditional food items has diminished during the last century (Pars 1997; 2000), fish, seabirds, and marine mammals still constitute a substantial part of the daily Greenlandic diet. In 1901, traditional food made up more than 80% of the daily energy intake, contrary to 25% today (Pars 1997).

• Vitamins and minerals in the traditional Greenland diet (here)

• 20 Foods High in Vitamin A (here)

Additional Research exposing MMR vaxsins

• Is Measles Really Caused by a "virus" (here)

• Honorable Dr. Wakefield vs. Brainwashed Pro-Vax Cult (here)

• Pharmakeia's Jabs Linked to Debilitating Autism Epidemic (here)

• "Some" Additional Links Connecting Pharma's Toxic Jabs to Autism (here)

• Measles & Mumps in the Long Run Improve Life (here)

• Are "Liable Free" Jab-Killers causing disease with MMR v@xSINs? (here)

Being from South Africa, I can’t monetize my substack.
If you’d like to buy me a SA cup of coffee, go - here,
For PayPal contributions, please go - here.
Thank you.

https://linktr.ee/hewettinsite
https://andrew-hewett.pixels.com/