The Wuhan "Isolation" issue

A sequencing scam that got accepted by Virus Believers as being based on pure "Science"

Before getting into the so-called isolation process of the “SARS-CoV-2 virus” done in “China”, I think that it is important to note that all the Cult building blocks of “Virology” are out of alignment with truth and the scientific method. This article has yet to be disputed by the Scientific world, considering all the other work done showing the history of lies, it seems wise that when the Pharmakeia-controlled WHO calls a “virus Pandemic,” we question what the true cause of illness actually is.

• A collection of Articles showcasing the "No Virus" Perspective (here)

This is a good start in understanding that, besides the massive flaws with “visus isolation,” there are huge issues with how genome sequences can be created.

• Fan Wu Toilet Paper Rolls (here)

When I wrote an article showing how pathetic Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Richard Fleming behaved in the earlier stages and why they are likely to continue to behave as ignorant, arrogant representatives of the “Health Freedom Movement”, this article also includes a testimony by Dr. Li-Meng Yan.

• SARS-CoV-2 "Sequenced", but not "Isolated" (here)

The “SARS-CoV-2” sequence was obtained directly from a lung sample, i.e, conventional BS pseudo-science isolation techniques were not used, i.e, put the culture in a petri dish, starve it, add bovine serum, antibiotics, and toxic chemicals until an “isolated” particle presents itself. They sent the lung samples directly to an independent Lab for sequencing, and this is where the Computer Trickery begins. Dr. Yan put forward that the lung samples were tested against the “SARS virus sequence”, but who’s to say that it wasn’t tested against a modified sequence that was created between UNC & the Wuhan Lab, or that was sent directly from UNC? i.e, how did the ACE-2 furin cleavage sequence find itself a part of the Spike Protein sequence?

• What’s so important about a Furin Cleaver being added to the "Spike Protein" sequence? (here)

This is where it gets interesting - Dr. Stefan Lanka has already proven that if one has a predetermined sequence that one is testing against, then that set sequence will show up i.e. if one searches for the HIV sequence using a sample taken from a virgin, one would find the virgin tested positive for HIV, etc.

• Control Studies find "viruses" don't exist - say what? (points 5&6 here)

Christine Messy has shown that no pure isolate of the “biological sample” of the “SARS-CoV-2 virus” is in the possession of any of the major Global Scientific Institutes. All that exists is a computer sequence.

• Christine Massey's unsuccessful "virus" proof requests (here).

Neither the FDA nor the Intelligence Agencies of the United States insisted that the “Spike Protein” (SP) computer sequence undergo toxicological studies. They didn’t insist on trying to identify if questionable modifications had been applied to this part of the full “SARS-CoV-2” computer sequences. Anyone, in 2020, who claimed “SARS-CoV-2” was a “Wuhan Lab Leak” or a “Gain-of-Function virus” (both BS) was called a “Conspiracy Theorist”. This was done deliberately, i.e, in order for the FDA to justify why they didn’t do the toxicological studies, they needed the public to accept the view that a sequence sent from the CCP-controlled China was an organic “evolution” from Nature (virus storytelling BS), i.e, not a biotech weapon. Once the Jabs had been thoroughly rolled out, the “Lab Leak” view was used to help HERD the goy cattle into staying focused on the “Virus LIE” i.e. the Satanic Cult needs people to “Fear Thy Neighbour’s Invisible Virus” as to ensure that the people believe that they are the CAUSE of the “health problem” expressed within society. Rand Paul’s wife invested in Remdesivir, so when Rand Paul wrapped off-the-hook Fauci about the “Lab Leak”, he never questioned Fauci about how many people died being administered Remdesivir, etc.

• Fauci & Co.'s Remdesivir Murders (here).

The RT-PCR test was never calibrated for the sequence claimed to represent the fictional “SARS-CoV-2 virus” that people allegedly were “contagiously spreading” to each other. The inventor of the RT-PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, died 6 months before the WHO called their planned Certificate of Vaccination ID Plandemic. Dr. Mullis stated that the test was not for diagnostic purposes and specified to use it only up to x25 cycles.

• Was it an RT-PCR PLANdemic? (here)

• Can you catch a Cold? (here)

The corrupt CDC, FDA, WHO, etc, all allowed this incorrectly calibrated, bank-delivered test to be evaluated at 45x cycles, i.e, further proving that not one person subjected to the test could be qualified as having “contracted” the invisible “virus”. Why would the WHO accept “data” driven by this test as representing “truth in Science”?

• Are Banks, Big Pharma & Governments abusing public health for mammon? (here)

Two articles by Anthony Colpo break down the “SARS-CoV-2” identification story.

• The Great Covid Con: Sars-Cov-2 Doesn't Exist & Has NEVER Really Been Isolated (here)

• "Sars-Cov-2" Does Not Exist (Part 2): Why Chinese Researchers NEVER Isolated the Virus (here)

Links to the Origin of the alleged “SARS-CoV-2 virus”

1. FAKED COVID ORIGINS (here)

2. I believe when one becomes aware of how genetic sequencing can be tricked, as mentioned in my previous article…
   Genetic Sequencing and Its Deceptive Pitfalls (here)
   … and then check this article …
   The Controversial Purnima Wagh No "SARS-CoV-2 virus" story (here)
   … you will realize the Jab All Criminals ensured the Sequence they wanted to use in their toxic Jabs was “FOUND”!

3. Since the first report of novel pneumonia (COVID-19) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, there has been considerable discussion on the origin of the causative virus, SARS-CoV-2 (also referred to as HCoV-19)
   The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 (here)
   Fan Wu et al
   Rather than using the method, widely used by virologists, for “claiming isolation and pathogenicity through inducing cytopathic effects”, Fan Wu et al (the “first” inventors of the SARS-CoV-2 gnome) sent the sample extracted from the patient’s lung fluid straight for sequencing, for two De Novo assembly platforms to search for short genetic fragments or reeds. It is important to note that the samples sent for sequencing were not physically ISOLATED VIRUSES, but Crude Samples containing millions of unique genetic fragments from the patient himself and numerous microbes. Over 65 million reeds were produced from this genetic soup and pieced together to create 384 thousand Contigs on Megahit and 1.32 Million Contigs on Trinity. Perhaps with a predisposition to prove the unproven canard that there is the ongoing ability of viral spill-over from animals to cause severe disease in humans.
   Fan Wu et al chose the longest nucleotide sequence (30,474), which they claimed had a nucleotide identity of 89.1% with the insilico bat coronavirus genome (invented in 2018) ( a genome that is as close to a human as a house cat). Subsequently, it was decided that the gnome needed a cut and paste, perhaps to make it look even closer to the 28,802 nucleotides of the bat model, and it was reduced to 29,875 nucleotides in the next version in GenBank. The artists weren’t finished with their creation, and a third and final model was drawn with a terminal sequence featuring 23 consecutive Adenine Bases which looked more like the Bat model featuring 26 consecutive Adenine Bases on its tail. It was unclear how the virologist knew which gnome to choose when all the options were hypothetical computer constructs.
   A year later, Dr. Wu Zunyou admitted in an interview that the “virus” was not “isolated”. Bill Gates's money was used to fund the two institutions, Fudan University and China CDC, where 14 of the 19 co-authors involved in the “sequencing article” worked.
   A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China (here)
   Peng Zhou et al
   This article was received by Nature 13 days after Fan Wu et al’s, but was published online in the same volume, on the same day. These authors claim “successful isolation” of what they call 2019 inCoV, based on the cytopathic effects they observed in three cell lines, however, these are illegitimate proxies for the postulated infection of a healthy animal or host. The three cell lines employed were Vero E6 Cells derived from the kidney of an African Green Monkey, Huh7 Cells, a human liver cell line taken from a Liver Tumour in 1982 and subsequently cultured, and human HeLa Cells derived from a female human in 1951 suffering from cervical cancer and subsequently cultured. None of these cell lines meet the postulated criteria of a healthy host with which to test for pathogenicity, but are favored as they produce the effects being sorted, the cytopathic effects, and the appearance of extracellular vesicles. To the cell lines were added, among other items, inorganic salts, Fetal Bovine Serum to feed the cells, and an array of cytotoxic items such as Amphotericin-B (an antifungal), Trypsin-EDTA (hydrolyzed protein), Penicillin (an antibiotic), Streptomycin (an antibiotic), Glutaraldehyde (a disinfectant), Osmium tetroxide ( an acutely toxic oxidizing agent) and Epoxy Resin (to create a solid substrate for ultra-thin slicing).
   Bizarrely on the basis that RNA of unknown prominence was part of the culture of which many cells died by way of induced starvation and stress with cytotoxic ingredients. The authors claimed that they had successfully isolated the “virus” (called 2019-nCoV BetaCoV/Wuhan, not that the cocktail of cytotoxic ingredients had decimated their abnormal cell lines. In short, Peng Zhou et al fulfilled none of the postulates to identify the “virus” or confirm it as being causative of any disease. The alleged virus had not even been physically isolated and purified for biochemical characterization and hence remained entirely theoretical. The Bill and Melinda Foundation provided the Chinese Academy of Sciences, where 24 of the 27 co-authors were affiliated, with another “financial grant”.
   A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin (here)
   Gorbalenya, A, E, et al
   This article features Ralph S. Baric and Christian Drosten – no evidence for a “coronavirus” was provided; this article was simply a “statement” by a “study group”.
   In other words, the proximal origin paper remains as fatally flawed as the virological nonsense that informs it.
   Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: The species and its viruses – a statement of Coronavirus Study Group (here)
   New Evidence: The Drafting and Publication of “The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2”
   “The evidence available to the Select Subcommittee suggests that Dr. Anthony Fauci “prompted Dr. Kristian Andersen to write Proximal Origins, and that the goal was to “disprove” any lab leak theory.

4. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome (here)

5. The story of “specific antibodies” being produced to a “specific antigen” is a complex topic (here)
   July 3 2020 - The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy or autopsy tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.
   Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.
   Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).
   Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.
   No one has died from the coronavirus, says leading pathologist (here)

6. Dr Steven Quay claims that “Forensic examination of Wuhan Institute of Virology Covid-19 patient specimens from December 2019 reveals gross contamination of the laboratory”. This means that Dr. Quay ASSUMES that real contaminating particles were freely contaminating the first “Wuhan mucosal Sample” and that he further IGNORES that all these sequences, “contaminating the pure sample”, could have been a part of a COMPUTER Sequence that had NO relation to real particles or that a synthetic particle created from the Computer Generated/Modified “SARS-CoV-2” Computer Sequence was placed within biological particles and then sequenced using SARS or the “SARS-CoV-2” (yet to be “discovered”) to “qualify”/”validate” this “virus’s” existence.
   Should the “Lab Contamination”, to this degree, truly exist, and there are “NO” alternative explanations (there are), one would think that, according to Germ Theory, all the Wuhan Lab members would be dead by now. Understanding that an external Lab did the sequencing and that sequencing is NOT “PURE” Science I reject Dr. Quay’s assumptions that the “SARS-CoV-2” sequence wasn’t placed there to be “discovered so that its toxic “Spike Protein” sequence would be a part of the justification to use the novel mRNA injections. I would love to get an explanation regarding Dr. Quay’s belief in being able to gauge the “age of a virus”.
   Why COVID-19 came from a lab. Dr. Quay speaks at the TFAS Capitol Hill Lecture. (here)

7. CONTAMINATION OR VACCINE RESEARCH? RNA Sequencing data of early COVID-19 patient samples show abnormal presence of vectorized H7N9 hemagglutinin segment (here)
   28 May 2020
   In order to understand the molecular epidemiology and genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 in China, we generated 53 genomes from infected individuals in Guangdong using a combination of metagenomic sequencing and tiling amplicon approaches.
   Genomic Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Guangdong Province, China (here)

8. Cooking up fake COVID-19 stats (here)
   Sequencing Technology: Illumina
   Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome} (here)

9. Externally Sequenced, but not "Isolated" (here)

10. USMortality.com's Dive into the Genomics of “SARS-CoV-2” (here)

11. On March 9, 2020, the Medical Journal of Australia website posted a preprint authored by 16 researchers, 14 of whom hailed from the Doherty Institute. The remaining two worked in Victoria government-funded health and academic positions. The researchers claimed to have isolated SARS-CoV-2 from the first patient diagnosed with 'COVID-19' in Australia.

    The reason why the Health Freedom Movement still believes in "viruses" is because they don't understand the pseudo-science used in the "isolation" process, which continues into the genetic sequencing assumptions. Not only has the Health Freedom Movement done near nothing to understand this "virus isolation" debate, but they promote a "Gain-of-Function" version of this pseudo-science. Because of this lack of engaging in understanding that which is used to "justify" the "immunization" agenda of Pharmakeia's, questioning how it would be possible for the Jab All Vaxpass killers could create a "Fake Virus Pandemic" has equally been ignored. This pattern is set to continue as Del Bigtree digs down into "Science" that has been done with the CONFIRMATION BIAS of Virology. Del is incapable of halting his own BIAS regarding this Scientism Cult version of reality. I commend him for being able to show how problematic alleged "immunizers" are toxic crap, but without the proof these "virus" particle exist, there would be no justification to pretend anyone is being "protected" against their "disease causing neighbor". This is a SAD state of affairs as it does require effort into working out how this "virus science" needs to be reframed from the Terrain Model perspective … this will expose all the false assumptions and allow for mankind to begin to understand that we do not have an "Immune" System, we will then incorporate Hormesis Science (antigen resistance), the Bolus Effect, understanding antibodies better, and ultimately what causes disease.

    The Great Covid Con: Sars-Cov-2 Doesn't Exist & Has NEVER Really Been Isolated (here)

    The Peter Doherty Institute: Meet Australia's Spectacularly Wrong COVID Alarmists (here)

Being from South Africa, I can’t monetize my substack.
If you’d like to buy me a SA cup of coffee, go - here,
For PayPal contributions, please go - here.
Thank you.

https://linktr.ee/hewettinsite
https://andrew-hewett.pixels.com/